Problem Solving
Mathematics
does not come easy to all of us and in fact was referred to as the “Marmite
subject." (Tiley-Nunn, 2014, p.1) and referred to as a social stigma,
although less pronounced than literacy. This problem is believed to be a factor
of bad experiences early in education (Marshall et. Al. 2016, p.66).
Is
numeracy really that important to us in problem solving?
“developing
a good, lasting understanding of mathematical concepts and the confidence to
use and apply numerical skills in everyday life. It includes experiences that
enable children and young people to develop their broader numeracy and financial
skills by exploring relationships in quantities, space and data, and to apply
them to real-life situations. Mathematics helps children and young people to
make sense of the world around them and to manage their lives. It gives them
skills they need to interpret and analyse information, solve problems and make
informed decisions” (Donaldson, 2015, p.49).
Regardless of each person’s
individual mathematical ability, it is hard to argue that we all need a basic,
core mathematical knowledge to get by in everyday life for basic problem
solving. So how do we ensure that these core skills are obtained by all children?
“The
key to enthusing pupils about problem-solving is removing the main barrier that
prevents independent thought, and that is fear: fear of not understanding, fear
of being wrong and fear of being embarrassed. The first step to creating young
problem-solvers is to reduce these fears for them.” (Tiley-Nunn, 2014, p.10).
Therefore, a way of addressing these fears would be an important step in overcoming
this issue. Tiley-Nunn propose a method with which “you can’t go far wrong”.
They propose the following formula for a positive outcome:
(Interesting
+ Accessible) x Challenging = Excellent
That
means:
1)
Interesting -
the idea or concept must be interesting to keep children’s attention;
2)
Accessibility
- the children must understand what they are dealing with; and
3)
Challenging –
it must present a challenge for the whole classroom.
This
seems like a sensible approach but in my view can suffer from an inconsistent
response in classes with students of varying abilities. Whilst the first two
parts of the formula can probably be applied to any classroom, the third might
be a stumbling block for those children with less natural ability. I therefore
think that this will work best in classrooms where children’s abilities are
reasonably balanced.
Resnick proposes a similar idea
based on classroom engagement which in my view would still require a classroom
with children of similarly balanced abilities. “If we are to engage students in
contextualised mathematics problem solving, we must find ways to create in the
classroom situations of sufficient complexity and engagement that they become
mathematically engaging contexts in their own right . . . They should also
permit students to develop questions, not only solve problems posed by others”
(Resnick, 1988, p.38)
Donaldson,
emphasizes the need to teaching well as a vital component of learning
mathematics. “Taught well through relevant contexts, mathematics can engage and
fascinate children and young people of all interests and abilities. It provides
strong support for the development of wider skills, particularly critical
thinking and problem solving, planning and organisation, and creativity and
innovation. It enables people to communicate ideas in a concise, unambiguous
and rigorous way, using numbers and symbols. A high level of numeracy and
mathematical competence is important for the prosperity of the country.”(Donaldson,
2015, p.49).
Despite much development in teaching methods and
theory, it is still a fact that basic understanding of mathematics remains a
daunting prospect for many who fail to realize its importance in our daily
lives. Far too often, you also see many
children thinking of mathematics as a useless subject that they have to do
simply because it is in the school curriculum. So perhaps the most important issue
to tackle is that from an early age a different approach is required, whereby
the basic concepts are put across in a more practical manner with emphasis on
basic problem solving – using play as a method has been shown to produce very
good results. This kind of approach would ensure that the concepts of problem
solving are instilled into children’s minds from a very young age such that it
becomes a normal everyday tool that they use without giving it much thought.
Pratt
advocates this kind of practical approach: “mathematics affects not how much
knowledge they ‘acquire’, but the kind of knowledge they develop. Children
taught through problem solving and mathematical thinking simply develop a different
kind of mathematical knowledge than those taught through explanation and
routine practice”. (Pratt, 2006, p.62)
If we were to analyse any particular day in our
lives, we could come up with quite a few instances where we have used
mathematics to solve an everyday problem. How much money do I need to buy the
items I need from the shop today ? How far do I need to walk to get to a particular
location ? Did I get the right change at the shop? How much of each ingredient
do I need to make 100 cupcakes ? These are but a few examples of everyday
problems that we solve without giving much thought to but are possible thanks
to our basic understanding of mathematical concepts. In my view it is therefore
very hard to argue that numeracy is not important in problem solving, I would
in fact state that it is absolutely essential and we therefore need to make
sure that our teaching methods and approach are able to deliver the best
possible foundation for our young children.
References
Donaldson, G. (2015). Successful
futures: Independent review of curriculum and assessment arrangements in Wales.
Welsh Government.
Marshall, E.M., Wilson, D.A
& Mann, V. (2016) Attitudes and Anxiousness bout maths. In Brave New World:
Proceedings of the CETL MSOConference (pp. 66-74). Chicago
Pratt, N. (2006) Interactive Maths Teaching in the Primary
School. London: Sage.
Resnick, L. B. (1988) ‘Treating
mathematics as an ill-structured discipline’, in R. I. Charles and E. A. Silver
(eds) The Teaching and Assessing of
Mathematical Problem Solving. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Tiley-Nunn, N. and Beadle, P.
(2014) Primary Maths: Anyone can
feed skittles to sharks. London: Independent Thinking Press.
Comments
Post a Comment